Saturday 24 February 2007

Where’s Your Team, Professor Yunus?

by Syed S. Kaiser Kabir

Disclaimer:
The views expressed here are of the author's alone and does not necessarily reflect that of Phiriye Ano Bangladesh's



Professor Yunus has been my hero for nearly 25-years. He’s a rare gem who not only thinks big, but also delivers spectacularly.

So, when he threw his hat into the political arena, one expected a wave of support bordering on hysteria. Yet, the response has been distinctly tepid. Even my own reaction as the self-appointed president of his fan club has been far from euphoric. Why?

To put it bluntly, the general perception is that the esteemed Nobel Laureate is going about it the wrong way.

For starters, Professor Yunus seems to be under the impression that his success as a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) would be easily replicable to the political landscape. There is some merit in this belief. After all, his success is not limited to microcredit only. Think telecom, textile, and health foods. In each of these areas, he knew nothing about the respective field when he started. So, the fact that he is a political novice is not an insurmountable obstacle, but just a temporary setback.

But wait! In these other fields, the role of Yunus was primarily to ensure that right team took over at the helm. So he enlisted the help of companies such as Telenor and Danon who are experts in their respective fields. Where is his team in this political expedition?

The Professor must recognise that he is a novice in politics. His role during October 2006 to mid-January 2007 ---- one of the darkest periods of this country’s history was bewildering. His unthinking statements and acts of the time deserve no better than a capital F.

His latest gaffe is the “Yunus Shomorthok Goshti.” At a time when the Nation is seeking to move away from personality cults, this move of his is a public relations Hiroshima. Clearly, he’s being badly advised, or more likely, not being advised at all. Also, how else can one explain the call to the general public form 20-person committees at neighbourhood levels at their own initiative? How does one control for quality? Team building is the primary function of a leader. It cannot be taken lightly.

Undoubtedly the Yunus brand has voter appeal. But it would be a monumental mistake to think that he could win on the celebrity card alone. He needs a strong team that devises and implements a winning strategy.

What would a winning strategy look like? In business, a company rarely achieves greatness by taking its rivals head-on. Instead, it rewrites the rules of the industry through innovation or intelligent positioning. For Professor Yunus the strategy has to be similar. There are four key areas where his party should focus:

First, demographically the largest segment of the electorate is under 35. To this group, Mujib and Zia are legendary figures in the history books. This group grew up with essentially no living national heroes with whom to identify. All that changed of course when the Professor won the Noble Peace Prize. Significantly, as numerous surveys have shown, this group is also politically apathetic mainly because of their disgust and disillusionment with the present menagerie of politicians. This group represents a natural constituency for Professor Yunus. In stark contrast to the political culture that mainstream politicians have fostered, Yunus is visionary, forward-looking, managerially competent, and honest.

The key question here is does the Professor know how to reach out to this young group? Does his team include bright young professionals who understand the youth and can communicate with them?

Second, apart from a brief flirtation by General Ershad, the mainstream political parties have tended to marginalise local government despite promises to the contrary. Power has become increasingly concentrated in the Centre. Decisions for local development are decided upon and funded by the Centre. Yet, local government represents the biggest opportunity for Professor Yunus to deliver a googly to his opponents. The argument is simple: As power is concentrated in the centre, the Member of Parliament (MP) becomes supremely important in a given constituency. However, if Professor Yunus can credibly promise to promote local government, meaning shifting power to local levels, then the role of the MP becomes less important. In other words, the history of the MP as a person who has worked on behalf on the constituency for many years becomes less important, making entry easier for a new political party.

Credibly promising power to local governments requires specialised knowledge at the Upazilla level. Who are the Professor’s team members that are experts in local government?

Third, there are about 12 million microcredit borrowers. This group could conceivably lean towards the Professor. However, it is not clear whether the microcredit borrowers, especially non-Grameen members associate microcredit with Professor Yunus. Even if they did so, their warm regards might waver once the Professor sheds his banker’s robes for those of a politician.

Clearly, a major communication exercise has to take place between the Professor’s party and the borrowers. The question therefore is who are the public relations experts in his team that can deliver on this front?

Fourth, there are certain constituencies, mainly located in urban areas where voting largely represents the mood of the Nation. In such areas, the role of the MP tends to be minor. As the mood of the Nation is anti-mainstream political party at the moment, these constituencies should be relatively easy pickings for the Professor.

The key exercise is to identify the right ones. Here the Professor has to rely on electoral math wizards. Will these geniuses in the Professor’s team please stand up!

There is a wonderful American folk-saying, “If you can get it all done by yourself, then you ain’t got much ambition.” Bangladesh has huge ambitions for the days ahead, and the Nation needs the Professor to rise up to the challenge.

So, Professor, my hero of a quarter of a century, don’t try to do it all by yourself. Build a great team; listen and rely on them.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The concept of mohalla-based committees to be developed by the citizens is a ground-breaking one. It is true, the risk factor is the wrong people might again come to the show. But it also provides a platform for the citizens of
our country as a whole to be a genuine part of the reform process of our political existence.

This may sound impossible....but it is not! We as citizens owe
responsibility to ourselves to rebuild our nation. We cannot anymore, under any circumstances leave it to the current corrupt political framework to run
like this! We must come forward & do something about it.

Stargazer said...

People: don't you think it’s about time we had had a break from these moronic fools & bloody political thieves better know as AL & BNP. I understand Dr. Yunu's announcement was a bit premature not well planned, but aren't you forgetting that he is the master of making things happen. His Grameen Bank is the living example. What bigger honor can there be for a country. He had a modest start (lending Tk. 856 from his pocket) & helped millions of poor people of the country to come out of the vicious cycle of poverty. Which bloody political party has done so far??? None 0. Guys its About time see some change, and I can't think any better agent of change than Dr. Yunus. So say we all.

The other organizational structure & everything will fall into its own place & position if you are clean at heart. The intention to do something better for the country from the heart will drive everything positively. Nothing is bloody impossible.

Azim Fahmi said...

While getting people like Dr. Yunus in Bangladeshi politics is great news, we need to get few other things changed in our political system that may be key.

Getting a "moholla" or community based team is anything but new. How is it different from "student" politics? What's needed is making sure entering "politics" is as noble as any other profession. No?
We also need to believe in due process and align our actions with such belief. Also, maybe I have been out of the system for too long, but everytime I have visited Bangladesh, I 'd felt that people have become cynical and desensitized by wide spread corruption. Like the early 90's of people's revolt against Ershad, this second wave of revolution is welcoming; however, the fate of it, whether we have a new pary of Dr. Yunus or not will be the same if we do not have some basic changes to the existing political structure and processes in Bangladesh.

Whether Dr. Yunus' party succeeeds or not, following are some of my thoughts in the change process:

1. As much as we need to separate executive from the judiciary -and I think the current CA and entourage have succeeded in implementing the code somewhat - we need to make sure it does not get rescinded by the next parliament. Similarly we need to separate legislative from the executive form of government in Bangladesh.


2. Voting around pary lines in parliament is self-serving. Eliminating the party line voting practices is key to making a parliament effective.

3. Increase the number of members of the parliament. 300 is not enough to represent 150 Million people.

4. The "Debaathification" analogy holds true in the context of the changes in current Bangladeshi political platform and political witch hunt in the name of reform may at one point backfire, should we not work in the direction of defining time-lines for voter lists, ID cards and most importantly next election dates.

5. In the context of history, self-righteous people, how noble they thought there ideas and philosophies were, had been the least righteous. We need to be cognizant of that and not try to envision a Utopia, that is simple impractial. The world is not perfect, but at the same time I always believe that majority of the people in this world, even in Bangladesh is "good". We just need to make sure we move on and implement policies and procedure that will enable Bangladesh to steadily flow with the tide of globalization .


Thanks

Azim

Mahmudul Hasan said...

The problem is that , Younous may win, but who will be his companions. There should be a solution to this, I hope our great leader will think some .

Zeeshan Hasan said...

The organizational problems faced by Yunus as well as any other non-BNP/non-AL can only be resolved if more people get involved. Check out http://www.nagorikshakti.wordpress.com