Sunday, 11 February 2007

A broader horizon, but a smaller view

Photo: daily star













Must read for all.

Irum has nailed it and has done a fantastic job here to give a complete picture of the current urban youth, their apathy towards politics and the lack of ideology in their direction. The million dollar question is how can we change it and engage them for social change...

Take a look....its a long read but a very comprehensive one and yes, also try to answer the question.

A broader horizon, but a smaller view by Irum Ali Khan

When you ask any of the group in question what they ‘believe’ in, most of them will be at a loss for words. This is a generation of cynics, not idealists. Their grandparents dreamt of a free India, their parents dreamt of a free Bangladesh, their older siblings dreamt of a government free from dictatorship. What do the current generation dream of? A better life, for sure, but a better life that concerns only them. This is not to accuse them of selfishness, but merely to highlight the absence of any guiding socio-political philosophy that would tether them to their society. The radical leftist and/or pro-independence political leanings of their parents’ generation seem a distant dream to a group of youth who are wary of politics. They see politics as destructive, and ultimately pointless. Look at their Dhaka University brethren, they say — caught in the mire of endless session jams due to the whims of the all powerful student wings of the major political parties. Nothing will change, and one party is as bad as the other, so why get involved? They see no marked ideological difference in the manifestoes of the reigning parties, and see elections as a merry-go-round where one party steps off to let the other on while the music and background remain the same. One party in practice is as bad as the other, so what’s the point in being engaged in the political process at all?

Asking them about the possibility of social change through activism unallied to politics brings forth an equally indifferent response. What’s the use, they shrug? All the aid money gets pocketed or squandered, NGOs are a rip-roaring business, the poor will get poorer and according to the news and we will remain the most corrupt country in the world. All around them, they see the failure of civil institutions to serve the needs of the people. Many of the young do not demonstrate an iota of faith in the power of advocacy to change society. They exhibit a feeling of helplessness that eventually morphs into apathy and a desire to do what they can for themselves, rather than fight a losing battle for a lost cause. They do not see the power of small changes, of small steps forward. They see the process of degeneration as too far gone to halt. If people truly do define themselves through a sense of place, draw their identities from the cultures they live in, then the culture has failed our young — it might have given them material advantages, but it has failed to give them faith in their own abilities to make a difference.


Full write up

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Irum maps out the ground realities for Phiriye Ano Bangladesh. University students accused of being politically apathetic --- how the world has changed!

There is statistical evidence for her contention as well:

http://blog.electrikblues.com/?p=123

It’s going to be an uphill task to motivate the youth from private universities. Fortunately, Phiriye Ano Bangladesh seems to speak their language. “Coolness” characterises our mass communication approach. Hopefully we have at the right recipe.